President-elect Donald Trump's recent defeat at the Supreme Court tells us important things about the high court.

The Supreme Court’s remarkably speedy decision Friday to allow a controversial ban on TikTok to take hold will have a dramatic impact on the tens of millions of Americans who visit the app every day and broad political implications for President-elect Donald Trump.

The Supreme Court decided, by a scant 5–4 margin, that President Donald Trump would have to (virtually) sit through a sentencing hearing.

As New Year’s Eve traditions go, this one is pretty tame. At 6 p.m., exactly when one might release news if the goal is the smallest possible audience, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts delivered his annual report on the state of the federal judiciary.

The Supreme Court seemed likely to uphold a new law that could force TikTok to shut down in the U.S., with conservative and liberal justices alike expressing skepticism about the legal challenge.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over a challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access. Last year a federal appeals court in New Orleans allowed the state to enforce the law,

In his end-of-year judicial report, Chief Justice John Roberts chose to claim the mantle ... What does it mean when Supreme Court justices decide to freelance and freestyle as trial court judges ...

The Roberts court used a novel doctrine to blunt or undo many of Biden’s policy initiatives. But the president-elect was left curiously untroubled by this de facto judicial veto during his last term.

The Supreme Court appeared ready to uphold a law that will ban TikTok in the U.S. if its Chinese owners don't sell the widly popular platform.

He grew up in Long Beach, Indiana. As an attorney for the government and in private practice, he argued 39 cases before the US Supreme Court and won 25 of them. Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution. Roberts is the youngest chief justice since John Marshall in 1801.

Lower courts ruled that a task force that determines which treatments must be covered at no cost had not been validly appointed.

Two Republican appointees, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett, joined the court’s three liberals in ordering the president-elect to face sentencing on Friday.